Thursday, November 8, 2012

"Jekyll"

"Everybody has a dark side"
       So, I just found this awesome new show on Netflix: a six-episode miniseries entitled Jekyll. To start, let me say that I finished it in two days, and it only took that long because of school. Needless to say, it's really good! It was produced for BBC One, and written by Stephen Moffat; so, if you're a Doctor Who fan, you'll know that means that Jekyll is complicated, somewhat hard to understand, terribly heartbreaking, and fantastically brilliant.

       As Moffat explains, Jekyll is meant to be a modern-day sequel (not retelling) of the Robert Louis Stevenson novel "The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde." The story focuses on Dr. Tom Jackman (James Nesbitt), who, as a descendant of the original Dr. Jekyll, has inherited the family curse. Jackman has left his family, for their own protection, and spends most of his time in his secret hideout with his psychiatric nurse, Katherine Reimer (Michelle Ryan), who keeps an eye on both Jackman and his alter-ego, the infamous Hyde (also played by Nesbitt). Jackman and Hyde, at the beginning of the show, have a simply agreement and live in relative peace: Hyde is not allowed to kill anybody, or Jackman will turn himself in; and Jackman is not allowed to search for a cure, or Hyde will kill them both. Neither has the memories of the other, but they communicate via recording device. However, Hyde accidentally finds out about Jackman's family, his wife Claire (Gina Bellman), and their twin boys, which starts much of the conflict between Jackman and Hyde. Jackman fears for his family's safety when they are exposed to Hyde, who has not hesitated to torture or maim people.
Dr. Jackman attempting to restrain Hyde

       The real intrigue starts, however, with the introduction of the firm of Klein and Utterson, an organization which has been tracking Jackman/Hyde. Jackman's "friend," Peter Syme (Denis Lawson), and a mysteriously annoying American (of course!) named Benjamin (Paterson Joseph) are heading up the operation. When Jackman travels to Syme's house to confront and question his friend, he unintentionally releases Hyde upon his wife, Claire, who turns out to be far more feisty than she seems, and the two start an unusual and important relationship. Eventually, Benjamin and company corner Hyde in Syme's house and "explicitly" threaten Claire and the twins; at which point, Hyde officially kills somebody for the first time. Which lets you know that it's about to get interesting, because why would Hyde, a monster, defend Jackman's family?
Hyde being threatening -
Tell me the kid doesn't look like a psychopath!
      
       Soon after Jackman turns himself in for murder, he is captured by Klein and Utterson, and locked in a special box which "cures" him by killing off Jackman and leaving only Hyde in Jackman's body. Hyde is supposedly "the next step in evolution," and Klein and Utterson want to use his DNA to find cures for cancer and other such world-saving things. (But, I'm just saying, if Hyde was the next step in evolution, I'd like to stay just as I am, thank you, and not turn into a murderous psychopath!) What follows I really shouldn't reveal, and I left out a bunch of the plot, but it's definitely worth watching. James Nesbitt pulls off an excellent bit of acting, pretty much on par with Robert Carlyle's portrayal of Rumplestiltskin in Once Upon a Time. The physical differences between Hyde and Jackman aren't that great, besides different hair and eyes; yet you can't help but believe that these are two completely different men. Jackman is a timid, calm, cool, and collected man with a good heart, who just wants to be with his family and escape his dangerous alter-ego. Hyde, on the other hand, is a complete psychopath. You can't help but feel disgusted with him for most of the show. He threatens helpless girls, sleeps with just about everything that walks, beats up people to the point of near-death, and pretty much bites peoples faces off. He is, in a word (or two), creepy and insane!

Hyde and Claire
       The supporting cast is pretty good, too. I was impressed by Ryan's performance, and Bellman did her fair share of good acting most of the time. The storyline was pretty twisty and complicated, as I said, but good - and it had a very different take on the story of Jekyll and Hyde. Whereas in the original book, Hyde and Jekyll represent the best and worst of humanity in separate entities, and reveal the two conflicting ideas that reside in men, this representation of Hyde and Jackman represent something kind of different. *Spoiler alert, by the way! The Hyde of this version does not necessarily represent the evil nature of man, he represents love. This explains why Hyde never hurts the twins or Claire, and why he killed people who threatened them. His greatest purpose is to protect those he/Jackman love the most, his family. I thought it was very interesting, especially as a sort of conspiracy story, with the real-life Jekyll commissioning Stevenson to write the volume in order to throw others off the trail of how Hyde was really created.*

       So, all in all, I would definitely recommend this thrilling, intriguing, and mind-bending show, if you're able to handle the content - there are a lot of sexual references, threats, and scenes thanks mostly in part to Hyde, as well as a lot of high-end swearing, with a lot of dropped f-bombs and misuses of Christ's name. So, it's definitely not for everybody, but if you can get past those aspects you will find an excellent miniseries that makes you do what any good example of literature is meant to do - think.

Friday, August 10, 2012

Fruits Basket

       Before I started watching this particular anime on Hulu a few months ago, I hadn't watched any anime in a long, long time. I had been a fanatic in middle school. When Jetix came on TV back in the day, I would spend hours and hours watching Beyblade, One Piece, Tokyo Mew Mew, Super Robot Monkey Team Hyperforce Go! (yeah, not my best viewing choice ever), Zatch Bell, and Digimon. Oh yes, Digimon was my bane. I had to watch it every time it came on TV or I acted like I was dying. Even though, looking back, it wasn't all that great of a series. Especially not compared to... dun, dun, duh... FRUITS BASKET!!!
      
       A few months ago my friends and I somehow got on the subject of anime, and one of them recommended that I should watch Fruits Basket. At first, when she told me what it was about, I thought it sounded really wierd. Apparently, there's this really sweet girl who's living in a tent in the woods when she comes across this family, mostly made up of boys. This family, the Sohma family, decides to let Tohru stay with them, but what Tohru eventually learns is that the family is under a curse. Whenever they are really stressed out or hugged by someone of the opposite gender, they turn into one of the twelve animals of the Chinese zodiac. Even though this anime is set in Japan. Oh well. Anyways, the Sohmas take her in, and the rest of the series is basically about their misadventures and the breaking of the Sohma curse.

       I thought it sounded okay, so I gave it a go. And really, even though the series has its uber-wierd and slightly awkward moments, it was pretty amazing. I thought that Tohru Honda, the girl protagonist, would annoy the crap out of me. Well, she did a little, because she's just so dang cheery all the time, but I mostly ended up liking her strength of spirit to be happy in spite of recently losing her mother, and her selflessness. Tohru never thinks of herself. She spends all of her time thinking of how to make those around her feel happy and welcome; and in one instance in the series, she even spends all of her hard-earned money to buy her "family" Valentine's day chocolates.

       The first three Sohmas whom Tohru meets are Shigure, the dog of the zodiac and a novelist/pervert; Yuki, the purple-haired rat and the self-conscious "Prince" of the school; and Kyo (Lord, I hate being a fangirl, but... fangirl scream!!! AHHH!!!) the orange-haired cat of the family who has major anger issues. See, the cat is basically the utter outcast of the zodiac, and thus the outcast of the Sohma family. To see the whole story, watch the anime!

       Over the scope of the series, which is quite impressive, Tohru meets various other Sohmas, such as Ayame, the snake and Yuki's older brother; Hatori, the "dragon" of the zodiac and the mysterious family doctor; Rin, the horse of the family who also struggles with some anger issues; Haru, the cow whom you do NOT want to upset; and Momiji (another one of my favorites), the rabbit of the zodiac who looks way younger than he really is. All in all, they were a very colorful, intriguing, and fun cast of characters, each of whom I came to love and care about. All of them struggled with anger and pain due to neglect and abuse and the hands of their leader, Akito; but Tohru helps each of them to overcome their struggles and issues with her enduring cheerfulness and strength of character. That is most of why I loved this anime. There were a lot of lessons to be learned from watching the lives of these characters, such as how to love somebody more than yourself, that happiness is a choice, and that forgiveness is the most powerful thing in the world. It is also downright hilarious, and never gets bogged down in the heavy issues it represents. And lastly, who can ignore the romantic conflict in this shojo anime??? Tohru-Yuki, Tohru-Kyo, Tohru-Momiji... who will she end up with???
                                                            
       So all-in-all, I would definitely recommend this award-winner to anybody who would love a good, solid anime; and not just girls, although there are a lot of guys in this anime to fangirl-swoon over. Apparently this show has a large male fan base, and has a lot for them as well. It is definitely NOT just about romance. If it was, I probably would not be recommending it right now. But even more than watching the anime (which can be found on Netflix dubbed), I would very much recommend the manga, which tells the rest of the story that the 26 anime episodes only begin to unfurl. You can read it here; I'm pretty sure I read it all in about 5 days in the middle of studying for exams (http://mangafox.me/manga/fruits_basket/).

A Tale of Two Cities by Charles Dickens



“It was the best of times, it was the worst of times…” So begins Charles Dickens’s fantastic novel, A Tale of Two Cities. The book was published in 1859, and has since grown to become one of the most famous books of all time. It was Dickens’s aspiration, when writing the tale, to chronicle the events of the French Revolution in an enjoyable way. But when he finished, the Revolution wasn’t the only theme of the book. There is one recurring theme, which can be described in the phrase“recalled to life.” The entire tale practically revolves around this theme. In fact, the book begins and ends with it- in the recalling to life of a scarred, half- dead prisoner, and in the recalling to life of an uncaring, miserable man.

The events described in the book take place in the European cities of London and Paris, during the years of 1775-1795. While the two bustling cities are the major settings of the book, there are many smaller, equally important places, such as Defarge’s wine shop, where most of the Paris plot is set; Tellson’s Bank, the ancient, dusty bank which provides a central setting, both in London and Paris; and the Manette home, where many of the characters either live or spend their time.
The time period of this book was a cruel and trying one. The bloody French Revolution plays a large part of the book, although most of the tale takes place in the years beforehand- years of pomp, pageantry, and poverty in Paris, and years of crime and disorder in London. Dickens describes their situations in these words: “There were a king with a large jaw and a queen with a plain face on the throne of England; there were a king with a large jaw and a queen with a fair face, on the throne of France… France, less favored on the whole as to matters spiritual than her sister of the shield and trident, rolled with exceeding smoothness downhill, making paper money and spending it… In England, there was scarcely an amount of order and protection to justify much national boasting.” It is obvious that Franceand Englandare rapidly failing. Disorder is beginning to rear its ugly head, and discontent is slowly overrunning the people. In fact, in one grim paragraph, Dickens gives us a prophetic glimpse of what the future will hold for the two cities: death. This is essential to the book’s central theme, for without death, how can one be recalled to life?
Just as there are many settings in the tale, there are many characters. Most, such as Jerry Cruncher or Miss Pross, have relatively small roles, while others, such as Charles Darnay, a.k.a. the Marquis St. Evremonde, the good and decent husband of Lucie Manette; Mr. Jarvis Lorry, the business- minded yet kindhearted Tellson banker; and Monsieur Defarge, the French wine shop keeper / revolution leader, play larger roles. But the character who seems to stand out above the rest is Sydney Carton, a brilliant lawyer from London. As we learn when he is first introduced, Carton is almost identical in appearance to Charles Darnay, although in personality they are completely different. While Darnay is good, kind, honest, decent, and hardworking, Carton is lazy, untidy, drinks often, hates himself, and stubbornly refuses to change his ways. At one point in the story, he states, almost boasting, “I care for no man, and no man cares for me.”
In describing Carton’s hopelessness, Dickens writes, “Waste forces within him, and a desert all around, this man stood still on his way across a silent terrace, and saw for a moment, lying in the wilderness before him, a mirage of honorable ambition, self- denial, and perseverance. In the fair city of this vision, there were airy galleries from which the loves and graces looked upon him, gardens in which the fruits of life hung ripening, waters of Hope that sparkled in his sight. A moment, and it was gone. Climbing to a high chamber in a well of houses, he threw himself down in his clothes on a neglected bed, and its pillow was wet with wasted tears. Sadly, sadly the sun rose; it rose upon no sadder sight that the man of good abilities and good emotion, incapable of their directed exercise, incapable of his own help and his own happiness, sensible of the blight on him, and resigning himself to let it eat away.” But as the tale goes on, it becomes apparent that Carton is changing, forsaking his apathetic attitude and exchanging it for a determined, caring one. His only motivation is the love and kindness of Lucie Manette, Darnay’s wife. It is obvious that Carton loves Lucie, and he tells her that he would give even his life to keep her and those she loves happy.
This contributes to the book’s central theme in that Carton, at the beginning of the book, can be considered“dead.” He is living with no purpose or direction or motivation. But Carton is willing to sacrifice even his life to make Lucie happy, which he eventually does, and in his death, he is recalled back to life, love, peace, and happiness.
                                               
When Dickens first wrote A Tale of Two Cities, it wasn’t as a novel. He wrote the story in short installments, which were published weekly in a magazine. The installments were eventually bound together in book form, and were then further divided into three segments entitled Recalled to Life, The Golden Thread, and The Track of a Storm. The first segment, Recalled to Life, mainly tells of the rescue of Dr. Manette, a French doctor who has just been released from the Bastille after eighteen years of imprisonment. His aid comes in the form of an old acquaintance, Mr. Jarvis Lorry, who arrives in Paristo take the Doctor back to the safety of London. The second part, The Golden Thread,is the longest segment of the book. It includes many important parts of the plot, including Darnay’s salvation from being executed as a spy, Darnay and Lucie Manette’s marriage, and the storming of the Bastille in France. At the very end of The Golden Thread, Darnay receives a letter from an old servant who has been imprisoned in Paris, and he sets off to rescue him. The third section of the book, The Track of the Storm, picks up right where part two left off. Darnay has been imprisoned in Parisbecause of his aristocratic rank, and the other main characters set off to rescue him. It is Dr. Manette who finally succeeds in freeing his son- in- law, but the family’s celebration is short- lived. Darnay is arrested soon after his release, and this time his execution is certain. But in a surprising twist, Carton makes good on his promise to Lucie, and, secretly switching places with Darnay, is executed in his stead. The tale ends happily, with the rest of the protagonist characters fleeing to Londonwhere they will, presumably, live happily ever after.
Every good story has a main conflict. It is that familiar struggle between good and evil, between morality and sin, and even sometimes between pomp and poverty. In the case of A Tale of Two Cities, the main conflict is between the belligerent peasants and the neglectful aristocrats of Paris. Dickens creatively described Francespredicament in this way: “Across the streets, at wide intervals, one clumsy lamp was slung by a rope and pullet; at night, when the lamplighter had let these down, and lighted, and hoisted them again, a feeble grove of dim wicks swung in a sickly manner overhead, as if they were at sea. Indeed they were at sea, and the ship and crew were in peril of tempest. For, the time was to come, when the gaunt scarecrows of that region should have watched the lamplighter, in their idleness and hunger, so long, as to conceive the idea of improving on his method, and hauling up men by those ropes and pulleys, to flare upon the darkness of their condition. But, the time was not come yet; and every wind that blew over Franceshook the rags of the scarecrows in vain, for the birds, fine of song and feather, took no warning.”
At this point in the book, the French Revolution has not yet begun. It is only an idea, the impossible dream of a few starving, desperate, poverty- ridden peasants. But it is coming. Death is just over the horizon. It will not be long before the streets of Paris are made into a living hell, stained with innocent blood, ruled only by the twisted justice of “La Guillotine.” Yet there is still hope for Paris. In the moments before his death, Carton prophesies, “I see… long ranks of the new oppressors who have risen on the destruction of the old, perishing by this retributive instrument, before it shall cease out of its present use. I see a beautiful city and a brilliant people rising from this abyss, and, in their struggles to be truly free, in their triumphs and defeats, through long years to come, I see the evil of this time and of the previous time of which this is the natural birth, gradually making expiation [atonement] for itself and wearing out.” In other words, Pariswill one day be recalled to life.
In every part of this book, in every main conflict, in every main character, there is the recurring issue of recalling to life. Dr. Manette is recalled to life at the beginning of the book. Darnay is recalled to life from his near- execution. Carton is recalled to life at the end of the book. Even Jerry Cruncher, the errand man for Tellson’s Bank, is a resurrection man. I, being a Christian, take a delight in this message, for I as well have been recalled to life. In the words of my Lord, “I am the Resurrection and the Life, saith the Lord: he that believeth in me, though he were dead, yet shall he live; and whosoever liveth and believeth in me shall never die.” I would definitely recommend this book to people who are old enough to handle the old English style and the graphic, bloody scenes the take place in the middle of the book. It is an old classic, well written, and well worth the time spent reading it. 

   ***(Please, note, this is a project for school I wrote my senior year of high school... But it also gives a good summary of one of my favorite books!)

Friday, June 29, 2012

The Ghost and Mrs. Muir

       This movie is one that I happened upon by mere chance. My family was looking through Netflix this evening, looking for a good movie to watch, and I spotted this title as it was scrolling through. One of my friends, who is rather a movie connoisseur, had this movie in her collection, so I persuaded my family to  play it. Turns out it was a better choice than I thought it would be! And since I'm pretty sure there are a lot of people out there who wouldn't watch this old classic black and white movie, I thought I'd write a review about it! The film, produced in 1947, stars Gene Tierney as Mrs. Lucy Muir, Rex Harrison as the ghost Captain Daniel Gregg, George Sanders as Mr. Miles Fairley, and little Natalie Wood as Anna Muir.

       Now, to be completely honest and fair, this movie starts off in a smashingly boring fashion. Three women are sitting at a table, talking in annoyingly high-pitched voices about some urgent-sounding business. Needless to say, at this point, I was thinking "What have I gotten myself into?" But eventually I figured out that one of the women, a Mrs. Muir, was the widow of a man named Edwin. Edwin also happened to have been the son/brother of the other two women at the table. Mrs. Muir, now no longer tied down to her severe sister-in-law and hysterical mother-in-law, has decided to leave and strike out on her own, with her daughter Anna and maid Martha, in order to live somewhere by the sea.

       It is during this fight between the three women that we get our first glimpse of Mrs. Muir's sensible and stubborn nature. She is an utterly courageous and independent woman, quite unusual in her 1900s Victorian England setting. She eventually wins the argument, and she and her small family head to Whitecliff, where she rents out Gull Cottage, a mysterious house that is said to be haunted. Mrs. Muir, of course, is not afraid, and is quite determined to live in the house. She does notice, however, that strange occurrences are going on around her. The balcony door in her room keeps opening. She cannot light a candle in the kitchen. Finally, the unflappable Mrs. Muir calls out to the ghost, calling him a coward and daring him to show his face. So out calls the voice of Rex Harrison, telling her to light the "blasted" candle. She does, revealing the figure of the dashing Captain Gregg standing with her in the kitchen. After a few moments of fright, Mrs. Muir and the ghost have a chat, and decide that she can stay in the house, as can he; that is, so long as Mrs. Muir hangs the Captain's portrait in her room. We learn from this and the next few scenes that the Captain is a very "earthly" ghost, with a sharp tongue, a foul mouth, and loose morals. He calls himself a "man's man," a very seamanly personage. And it is very obvious that he loves the sea. When he talks about it, his eyes look with longing at things that are not before him, and he reveals the heart beneath his rough outer appearance. I could not help but grow very fond of the Captain, and apparently neither could Mrs. Muir.

      One day, Mrs. Muir receives word that she has no money left, and must leave the house. The Captain convinces her to stay, revealing his plan: he will tell her all the events of his life, and she will write them down in a book. The profits from the book, he tells her, should be enough to live off of. And so she writes, all the while falling for a ghost of a man who is more a whisp of salty sea air than real flesh-and-blood. They talk long into the night, they laugh, she scolds him for his language, and he calls her "Lucieta," a name he says fits her better than Lucy. It all seems so perfect, except for the fact that he is dead, and she is alive. Eventually, Mrs. Muir meets a man in town named Mr. Fairley. Now, this character bothered me to no end, because he was such an obvious creeper, and was obviously up to no good, but Lucy disappointed me and fell for him anyways, even after he followed her around, got into her personal space, stole a handkerchief form her, and painted a portrait of her when she wasn't looking. If that doesn't scream "Stay away from this guy," I don't know what does. But, even after her ghost and her maid warn her that this man is no good, Mrs. Muir obstinately, and disappointingly, insists upon becoming engaged to Mr. Fairley. It is at this point in the movie that Captain Daniel Gregg bids a fond farewell to Mrs. Lucy Muir. He leaves while she is asleep, but not before telling her that she must forget him, must live her own life and weather the storms that are coming on her own, without him to confuse her or hold her back. He makes it so that she remembers their time together as a mere dream, and then he disappears.
 
       Thankfully, just in time, Mrs. Muir comes to the realization that Mr. Fairley is not what he seems to be. He is a fraud who has a wife and two children at home, and has apparently fooled other women before her. Heartbroken, Mrs. Muir returns home, a lonely woman once more. Time passes. Years fade away as Mrs. Muir lives in her sea cottage, with only the gulls and her faithful servant Martha for companionship. Anna grows up and marries, and her daughter grows up and marries, while Lucy grows ever older and spends her time looking out at the sea, remembering her old dreams of a sea captain with whom she once wrote a book. Finally, the end comes. Mrs. Muir dies sitting in her armchair, and the first person to greet her is her beloved Daniel, who has been waiting for her all this time. The two walk out arm-in-arm, into the vast unknown, to be together for an eternity. Yeah, I know, I cried like a baby.

       The Ghost and Mrs. Muir is, undoubtedly, one of my new favorite b&w's, and probably even one of my top favorite romances of all time. The American Film Institute must have thought so too, because they ranked it on their "100 Years... 100 Passions" list (http://www.afi.com/100years/passions.aspx). The movie has a nicely-moving plot, a beautiful soundtrack, excellent cinematography, and superb acting. Also, it is about the sea, and I never could resist a good sea-story. To me, this movie spoke of the bitter-sweet regrets of life, a love that endures even life and death, and the longing for something greater and better somewhere out in the wide world; messages that go straight to the very heart of people. Perhaps that is why it touched my heart so much, and why it brought tears to my eyes. Or maybe it was just a darn good romance. Either way, in my opinion, this is a movie very much worth watching.

Sunday, June 10, 2012

The Squire's Tale by Gerald Morris

Let me start by saying that this book was amazing. I picked it up at the library kind of hoping that there would be at least some small morsel of goodness inside, because truth be told, it looked a little bit dumb. I mean, just look at the cover! But I was desperate, so I picked it up. One of the best choices of my literary life! This book had everything good and glorious within its pages. Heroic knights, fair maidens, epic quests involving duels, magical woodland creatures, and warlocks, and a very, very unlikely hero. Terence, a teenage boy living in merry old Arthurian England, was orphaned as a baby and raised by an old hermit living in the forest. One day, as Terence is hunting for supper in the woods, he meets Gawain, who is headed to Camelot to become a knight in the court of King Arthur. At the insistence of the hermit, Terence becomes the squire of Sir Gawain, and accompanies him on his various dangerous and exciting quests and adventures, some of which involve catching a white stag, accompanying a fair yet extremely annoying maiden on a quest, foiling the plot of an evil sorceress, and finding true love in an invisible faerie realm.
       While the plot and writing style are rather simple, they are extremely effective and interesting. The main character, Terence, is sympathetic as the reader sees his growth from naive orphan boy to the strong and confident squire of Sir Gawain (and something even more important). It is interesting that although Terence is the main character of the book, the focus of most of the book is more on Sir Gawain and his knightly adventures. However, this shift of focus works, as Terence's job is to follow Gawain on his quest; also, you never forget for long that the real hero of the book is Terence. On top of which, this book is hilarious! The humor is dry and subtle, the essential British humor, but still laugh-out-loud funny.
       Perhaps my favorite thing about this book, however, is that the author definitely did his homework. In the author's note at the back of the book, Morris confesses his passion for the Arthurian tales, especially those involving the character Sir Gawain. In "The Squire's Tale," he uses many of the old stories from books such as Malory's Morte D'Arthur and Sir Gawain and the Green Knight. It really feels like an old Arthurian legend, which, thanks to my British Literature class, is something I love! There really isn't anything bad to say about this book. It is very well-written all around and a great piece of storytelling. I would recommend it to anybody looking for a good, light piece of summer reading! More coming on the next books in the series when I can get my hands on them!